Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative activist, was fatally shot on Wednesday, Sep 11 2025, during a public event at Utah Valley University. Authorities are treating the incident as a political assassination.
Kirk, aged 31, was speaking at his “American Comeback Tour” under a tent as part of a “Prove Me Wrong” table when a single shot struck him in the neck. He was transported to a local hospital, where he died of his injuries.
Authorities believe the shot was fired from a rooftop or elevated position. Video footage shows the moment, with Kirk reacting immediately after being struck. A person of interest was initially taken into custody but has since been released after interrogation. The shooter remains at large.
In the aftermath of the assassination, multiple crypto tokens bearing Kirk’s name or referencing the tragedy began appearing. One prominent one is the “Justice For Charlie (CHARLIE)” token listed on CoinGecko under a Solana-ecosystem meme category, with the on-chain creator being an anonymous wallet.
As of now, no credible source has publicly confirmed who the creator or founding team behind the CHARLIE token is. Another one is KIRK, also another Solana-based meme coin (in fact, there seems to be more than one token going by the tickers CHARLIE and KIRK).
Such rapid appearance of multiple “tribute” or “justice” tokens after Kirk’s death has raised ethical concerns among commentators, especially when such tokens show patterns typical of speculation and money-grab in the face of tragedy.
Here is a prime example where crypto’s open, permissionless nature collides with morality. On the one hand, anyone can mint a token as a form of expression or tribute—but in practice, many of these so-called “memorial” or “justice” coins launch within hours of a tragedy and are structured to attract hype trading.
This raises the question of intent: are they genuine tributes, or attempts to profit from grief and media attention? Without transparency, clear utility, or community governance, such tokens often resemble speculative pump-and-dump schemes that exploit emotional events for financial gain, raising questions about opportunism, ethics and risk.

The former "crypto assets" and "traditional securities" will differ only in label, with no remaining essential distinction.

At the intersection of decentralized finance and social media data, an experiment regarding the "value of information" is facing its most severe survival challenge since its inception. On January 15, 2026, social media giant X (formerly Twitter) suddenly revised its platform rules, announcing the official revocation of API access for "InfoFi" applications, citing that such apps have generated large-scale spam to obtain token incentives. This decision instantly triggered a chain reaction in the Web3 space: as the leader in this sector, the Kaito platform token plummeted 19% within 24 hours, with its market capitalization shrinking to $160 million.

Market Accumulates Strength Amid Wait-and-See, Structural Opportunities Emerge in Capital and Ecosystem