Bangladesh maintains one of the strictest stances on cryptocurrency in the world. The Bangladesh Bank has repeatedly stated that cryptocurrencies are illegal for use and trading within the country. As a result, there is no dedicated crypto tax framework. However, from a tax perspective, any income or gains derived from digital assets may still fall under existing income tax laws administered by the National Board of Revenue (NBR). This creates a complex situation where crypto activity is prohibited, yet undeclared income—regardless of source—remains taxable.
Bangladesh does not recognise cryptocurrency as legal tender, financial instruments, or lawful digital assets. The Bangladesh Bank has issued circulars warning that crypto transactions violate existing laws related to foreign exchange, anti-money laundering, and payment systems.
Although there is no crypto-specific tax law, relevant authorities rely on:
While selling crypto is illegal in Bangladesh, any income or gain generated—if discovered—could be treated as taxable income under general income tax rules. Authorities focus on the existence of income rather than its legality.
Crypto-to-crypto transactions are not legally permitted. However, from a tax enforcement standpoint, gains realised through such activity may still be considered undisclosed income.
Crypto received through freelancing, mining, online services, or foreign platforms may be treated as income if converted or used economically, even though the underlying activity is prohibited.
Residents earning income abroad—including through digital assets—are generally subject to Bangladesh income tax rules if income is remitted or utilised locally.
There is no dedicated crypto tax rate. If crypto-related income is assessed, it may be taxed under standard income tax slabs applicable to individuals or businesses.
If crypto income is classified as undisclosed or unexplained income, higher effective tax rates and penalties may apply under NBR enforcement practices.
Taxpayers are required to declare all sources of income in their annual tax returns. Failure to disclose income—regardless of legality—can trigger audits and penalties.
Holding assets or income abroad may require disclosure under Bangladesh’s foreign income reporting rules, particularly if funds are repatriated.
Although crypto is prohibited, the NBR may still request documentation related to unexplained wealth or income, including bank statements and transaction histories.
Because crypto activity is illegal, losses are not recognised for tax deduction purposes. Loss offsets or carryforwards are not available.
NFTs are not recognised under Bangladeshi law. Any income derived from NFT sales or royalties—if discovered—may be treated as taxable income without legal protection.
Airdropped tokens may be viewed as unexplained income if they result in economic benefit.
DeFi participation is also prohibited. Any realised income may fall under undisclosed income rules.
Before considering tax compliance, individuals should understand that crypto activity itself is illegal in Bangladesh and may expose them to regulatory or criminal risk.
From a tax perspective, the NBR focuses on income disclosure. Any unexplained increase in wealth may be scrutinised regardless of its source.
Penalties may include back taxes, fines, interest, and potential legal action under tax, foreign exchange, or anti-money laundering laws. Enforcement is discretionary and case-specific.
Bangladesh remains a hostile jurisdiction for cryptocurrency, with outright prohibitions enforced by the central bank. While there is no formal crypto tax regime, income derived from crypto may still be taxable under general income tax laws if detected. Individuals should exercise extreme caution and seek professional advice when dealing with digital assets in Bangladesh.

The former "crypto assets" and "traditional securities" will differ only in label, with no remaining essential distinction.

At the intersection of decentralized finance and social media data, an experiment regarding the "value of information" is facing its most severe survival challenge since its inception. On January 15, 2026, social media giant X (formerly Twitter) suddenly revised its platform rules, announcing the official revocation of API access for "InfoFi" applications, citing that such apps have generated large-scale spam to obtain token incentives. This decision instantly triggered a chain reaction in the Web3 space: as the leader in this sector, the Kaito platform token plummeted 19% within 24 hours, with its market capitalization shrinking to $160 million.

Market Accumulates Strength Amid Wait-and-See, Structural Opportunities Emerge in Capital and Ecosystem